Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer

litigation, arguing & advocating is my passion

Do you need to assert your right to a trial so you can fight for a not-guilty verdict? If so, then Pissetzky Law LLC is the firm for you. Clients come to us when they want a bulldog in the courtroom. Our Chicago criminal defense attorneys take on serious criminal cases. We handle federal charges, white collar crimes, large-scale drug crimes, sex offenses, violent offenses, and more. We have argued cases before the Illinois Supreme Court, Illinois Appellate Courts, and Federal Appellete Courts. For more than a decade, we have helped clients fight off felony charges throughout state and federal courts.

Backed by a proven track record, our Chicago criminal defense lawyers have garnered recognition's such as inclusion in the National Trial Lawyers: Top 100 and Illinois’ list of Super Lawyers® Rising Stars℠. We are ready to battle for your rights, your freedoms, and your future.

No matter what crime you were arrested for, no matter how complex your charges may be, we offer the award-winning, trial-tested advocacy that you need at Pissetzky Law LLC.

Why Hire Pissetzky LAW, LLC?

OVER 20 YEARS OF TRIAL-TESTED DEFENSE
NOT-GUILTY VERDICTS & CASE DISMISSALS
10.0 OUT OF 10.0 SUPERB AVVO RATING
ILLINOIS SUPER LAWYERS®
IN THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS: TOP 100

OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE VICTORIES

Case Dismissed Case Dismissed After State Refuses to Cooperate
People v. IP (2014) Mr. IP was arrested for possession of a large amount of a controlled substance after Chicago police executed a search warrant. Arguing that the information in the search warrant was fabricated, Mr. Pissetzky filed a Motion to Produce Informant. Against the odds, the judge granted the motion and ordered the State to produce the informant. When the State failed to do so, the judge dismissed the case.
Not Guilty Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney Secures a “Not Guilty” for Possession, Conspiracy, and Intent
Chicago criminal defense attorney, Gal Pissetzky takes the fight all the way for his clients. Gal was able to secure a “not guilty” on all counts for his client in a case involving possession, conspiracy, and intent to distribute cocaine.
Case Overturned Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer Gets Drug Case Overturned
Chicago criminal defense attorney Gal Pissetzky takes the fight all the way for his clients, even when the fight involves creating new laws to protect their rights. While defending a day laborer accused of drug trafficking crimes, the prosecutor in the case questioned the man as to how he was able to come up with the $75,000 bail bond. The client was found guilty but Mr. Pissetzky objected to the bail bond reference and the case was overturned on appeal. When it was sent back to trial, Gal Pissetzky negotiated for time served and the client regained his freedom.
Not Guilty of All Charges Class X felony Possession with intent to deliver marijuana and cocaine

Not Guilty of All Charges
People v. LG – Not Guilty of a Class X felony Possession with intent to deliver marijuana and cocaine. Although the chicago police had a search warrant to search a home where they found large amounts of marijuana and cocaine, as well as an identification card and other proof of residency for LG, the judge found LG NOT GUILTY of all charges.
Sentenced Reduced Client Facing 40 Years Gets 4 Months Instead
Chicago criminal defense attorney Gal Pissetzky argues for a light sentence and wins! Mr. BC was charged with a large drug conspiracy in a federal court case. He was personally responsible for distributing over 200 kilos of marijuana. After intense negotiations with the government and without ever having to become an informant or a snitch, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the judge that Mr. BC should receive a very short sentence of four months, despite the fact that he was facing up to 40 years in prison. The judge agreed with Mr. Pissetzky and sentenced Mr. BC to just four months in jail.
Not Guilty on All Counts Cross-Examination by Chicago Criminal Defense Attorney Leads to a “Not Guilty”
People v. Z. (2009) – Mr. Z. was accused of transporting five kilograms of cocaine in a secret compartment of a car. After a trial in which Gal Pissetzky cross-examined officers from the elite narcotics division of the Chicago Police Department, the judge found Mr. Z. NOT GUILTY of all charges.
Federal Judge Imposes Light Sentence Over Government’s Objections Federal Crime
U.S. v. HJ (2014) Mr. HJ was charged as the leader of a large Chicago drug organization. The government attributed over 26 kilos of cocaine to Mr. HJ, and sought a minimum 15-year-sentence based on his alleged leadership role. After a very contested sentencing hearing, during which Mr. Pissetzky argued that Mr. HJ was not a the leader of the organization and should therefore receive a much lower sentence, the judge agreed with Mr. Pissetzky and told the government it had not met its burden of proof. Although the judge found Mr. HJ responsible for 26 kilograms of cocaine, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the judge to sentence Mr. HJ to only 70 months–nine years less than what the government wanted.
Reduced Sentence Federal sentencing on drug conspiracy charges – 18 months for 26 kilos of cocaine without ever cooperating
(USA v. MM) Mr. MM was charged in Federal Court with drug conspiracy to distribute over 26Kilograms of cocaine. The government used an informant and recorded calls. After long but successful negotiations with the government, Mr. Pissetzky was able to convince the prosecutor to amend the charges so MM won’t be facing the mandatory 10 years to life in prison. The government, however, still sought to send MM away for a long period of incarceration. MM never cooperated or became an informant!!!! Mr. Pissetzky filed a sentencing memorandum. During the federal sentencing hearing, Mr. Pissetzky argued to the Judge for a much reduced sentence. The Judge sentenced MM to a short 18months.
Not Guilty Gal Pissetzky Gains Not Guilty Verdict on Tough Drug Case. Defendant Wins!
(People v. CC) – FINDING OF NOT GUILTY – CC was charge with possession with intent to deliver 175 grams of cocaine, and 4 guns where also found during the search of the apartment he was in. Chicago police had a search warrant to an apartment that they claimed CC was living in with his girlfriend. During the search of the apartment, the police recovered 4 guns, ammunition, 175 grams of cocaine, and a scale. At trial, attorney Pissetzky and one other attorney established through cross-examination that the State could not prove that CC actually lived in the apartment. The judge found CC NOT GUILTY of all charges.
Case Dismissed Gal Pissetzky Gets Federal Drug Case Dismissed After Cross Examining DEA Agents.
Defendant Wins! (USA v LG) – RARE CASE OF NO PROBABLE CAUSE FINDING IN FEDERAL COURT – The DEA arrested LG with his wife and charged them with possession of 2.5 kilograms of cocaine. The government alleged at a preliminary hearing in federal court that LG’s wife was trying to sell the cocaine to an undercover DEA agents. Mr. Pissetzky was representing LG, who was arrested in the undercover DEA car after the wife handed the drugs to the DEA agent. During the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky questioned the DEA agent and established that LG was merely present during the drug deal. The federal magistrate judge found that there was not probable cause to arrest LG and ordered that the case against him be dismissed immediately.

TRUSTED AND HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

SEE WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING

“Highly Recommended”
Jesse
“Gal saved my life!!!”
Juan
“Very highly recommended!”
Scott E.
“Magnificent, impressive, very great work”
Mr. & Mrs. LaGrone Sr.
“Got me the best possible outcome I could have hoped for.”
“I highly recommend Gal Pissetzky!!!”
Sonni
“I HIGHLY RECOMMEND GAL PISSETZKY”
“Highly Recommended”
Chrissy
“Got me the best possible outcome, highly recommend”
Former Client
“He saved me from jail!”
Former Client
“Fantastic attorney”
Former Client
“Excellent Attorney”
Former Client
“Excellent Lawyer!”
Alberto
“I will recommend him to anyone who really needs the best attorney!”
Former Client
“Super professional and knowlegeable lawyer!”
Diana

Read Client Reviews

MEET YOUR LEGAL ADVOCATES

OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE

PRACTICE AREAS

LEARN MORE

Stay Updated

Direct Appeal VS Post-Conviction Dec 09
Following a conviction, a criminal defendant has an absolute right to appeal his conviction. He may do so by filing a direct appeal or, subsequently, ...
View More
Featured on AP News Video Attorney Pissetzky Shows Concern for Use of ShotSpotter Aug 19
ShotSpotter recently landed a man in jail on limited evidence. Attorney Gal Pissetzky provides his remarks on the video. Read the full article here on ...
View More
Vice News Article With Commentary From Attorney Gal Pissetzky Jul 26
Read the full article here on Vice.com! In the latest article, "Police Are Telling ShotSpotter to Alter Evidence From Gunshot-Detecting AI", published ...
View More

DON'T WAIT, CONTACT US NOW!

All Consultations are Free and Confidential

First Name:

Please enter your first name.
Last Name:

Please enter your last name.
Phone

This isn't a valid phone number.
Email:

Please enter your email address.

This isn't a valid email address.
Are you a new client?

Please make a selection.
Message

Please enter a message.