SE HABLA ESPAÑOL. MÓWIMY PO POLSKU.
Call For Your Free Consultation Now 312.883.9466
Menu
EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS DEFENDING CLIENTS NATIONWIDE

Chicago Murder Defense Attorney

Taking on Serious Felony Charges

Murder is one of the most serious crimes that you could be charged with. Being convicted of murder carries with it extremely heavy, life-altering consequences. If you are under investigation for a murder charge or have been arrested, it is imperative that you hire a skilled Chicago murder defense lawyer immediately.

At Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC, we have more than 15 years of legal experience fighting for clients facing serious felonies such as murder and attempted murder. We understand what is at stake and what takes to obtain a favorable outcome. We work aggressively to help minimize the penalties or to fight your charges in court. For a team of exceptional trial attorneys, turn to us.

Request a case evaluation: (312) 883-9466.

Consequences of a Murder Conviction

The minimum sentence for a conviction of murder in Illinois is 20 years in prison. Depending on the circumstances of your alleged crime, you could face additional time in prison. First-degree murder, which is the intentional, premeditated, and unlawful killing of another person, typically carries the heaviest sentence. Whether you are being charged with murder or attempted murder, we are prepared to fight for your future and a not guilty verdict in court.

The highest level of murder is one which involves special circumstances, such as:

  • Murder of more than one person
  • Murder of a young child or baby
  • Murder of a witness (to prevent testimony)
  • Murder of another as a hate crime
  • Murder of a prosecutor or judge
  • Murder of a law enforcement officer

Hard-Hitting Trial Attorney Ready to Fight for You: (312) 883-9466

Murder charges require the help of a skilled and proven Chicago criminal defense lawyer. At Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC, our attorneys are here to put their exceptional legal talents and skills to work for you.

Call today at (312) 883-9466 for a case consultation. Mówimy po polsku. Se habla Español.

OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE VICTORIES

  • CASE DISMISSED CASE DISMISSED AFTER STATE REFUSES TO COOPERATE
    People v. IP (2014) Mr. IP was arrested for possession of a large amount of a controlled substance after Chicago police executed a search warrant. Arguing that the information in the search warrant was fabricated, Mr. Pissetzky filed a Motion to Produce Informant. Against the odds, the judge granted the motion and ordered the State to produce the informant. When the State failed to do so, the judge dismissed the case.
  • Sentenced Reduced Heroin Conspiracy
    USA v. DA – 2011 – Mr. DA was charged in one the biggest Heroin busts in Chicago. DA was facing a mandatory life sentence under the Federal Rules because he was a repeat offender. After long negotiations, Mr. Pissetzky was able to demonstrate that DA was not part of the conspiracy and convinced the judge to sentence DA to only 37 months. All other charges were dropped.
  • Case Dismissed Motion Granted, Case Dismissed
    People v. RMC – Chicago police officers received information that a 2 kilo cocaine deal was going to happen in a garage. They set up surveillance and saw RMC pull into the garage in car. When he walked out of the garage, the Chicago police officers arrested him. While the officers searched the garage and car, they found 2 kilos of cocaine in the car. Mr. Pissetzky and another attorney filed a Motion to Suppress the Arrest and Quash the evidence. After a highly contested hearing, the judge held that the Chicago Police officers violated RMC’s Constitutional rights under the 4th Amendment, and Granted the Motion. The prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss all charges against RMC.
  • Not Guilty Not Guilty: possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver
    People v. JB – 2011 – Mr. JB was charged with 3 other co-defendants with possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver. Although the State’s attorney made a very low offer for a plea, Mr. Pissetzky advised JB to proceed to trail. During a bench trial, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that JB did not have any knowledge of the drugs that were recovered from the car of the co-defendant. Although the police testified that they saw the drug transaction, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the judge that the state did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge found JB NOT GUILTY on all charges.
  • Not Guilty on All Counts People v. AB
    AB was charged with child pornography, criminal sexual abuse and criminal sexual assault. Although the State made several offers on the case, Mr.Pissetzky and another attorney demanded trial. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross-examined the State’s witnesses and proved that AB did not know that the victim was under 18 years of age. After listening to the evidence, the judge found AB NOT GUILTY on all counts.
  • Dismissed People v. AH
    AH was charged with possessions with intent to distribute a large amount of cocaine. Mr. Pissetzky litigation skills led to the dismissal of all charges against AH.
  • Case Dismissed People v. ARP
    ARP was charged with a Class X felony of Possession with Intent to Distribute cocaine . After careful review of the police reports, Mr. Pissetzky filed a motion to quash and suppress evidence. At the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that that the Cook County Sheriff that stopped ARP search ARP’s car illegally. The judge Granted the motion to quash and suppress and the case against ARP was Dismissed.
  • Not Guilty People v. FR
    FR was charged with predatory criminal assault, and 4 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault. During a week long jury trial, Mr. Pissetzky exposed the alleged minor “victim” as a liar. In addition, Mr. Pissetzky call witnesses to testify to the true nature of the “victim”. After grueling cross-examinations, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all charges.
  • Not Guilty People v. H
    People v. H- H was charged with the first degree murder of 3 people. The prosecutor had two witnesses that claimed they were with H when he committed the murders. After receiving the discovery from the prosecutor, Mr. Pissetzky and his team conducted their own investigation and uncovered that someone else committed the murders. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross examined the prosecutions witnesses and exposed their lies. After the prosecution rested their case, Mr. Pissetzky moved the court to dismiss all charges and find H not guilty. The Judge agreed with Mr. Pissetzky and found H Not Guilty of all charges dismissing the case.
  • Not Guilty People v. RT
    RT was charged with Possession with intent to deliver half a kilogram of Heroin. RT was facing a Class X Felony. Chicago police officers executed a search warrant at his home where they seized the Heroin. Mr. Pissetzky demonstrated to the judge during cross examination that RT did not have the required knowledge that the Heroin was at the home. The judge found RT Not Guilty.

TRUSTED AND HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

SEE WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING
  • “Gal saved my life!!!”

    Juan

  • “Excellent Lawyer!”

    Alberto

  • “Got me the best possible outcome I could have hoped for.”
  • “Magnificent, impressive, very great work”

    Mr. & Mrs. LaGrone Sr.

  • “Excellent Attorney”

    Former Client

  • “I highly recommend Gal Pissetzky!!!”

    Sonni

  • “Fantastic attorney”

    Former Client

  • “I knew I was done until I hired Gal”

    Former Client

  • “Highly Recommended”

    Jesse

  • “He saved me from jail!”

    Former Client

  • “Got me the best possible outcome, highly recommend”

    Former Client

  • “Gal saved me from prison”

    Gerardo

  • “I will recommend him to anyone who really needs the best attorney!”

    Former Client

  • “Very highly recommended!”

    Scott E.

  • “Super professional and knowlegeable lawyer!”

    Diana