Call For Your Free Consultation Now 312.883.9466

Chicago White Collar Crime Attorneys

Call (312) 883-9466 for a Case Consultation!

White collar crimes are non-violent, financially motivated criminal offenses typically committed by those in positions of power or with access to large amounts of money. In a city with high incidents of public corruption like Chicago, investigations are rampant - even if you are innocent.

At Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC, we are prepared to aggressively defend you against any type of white collar felony charge. Whether you are facing felony charges for a white collar crime on a state or a federal level, count on us for hard-hitting, effective defense. Our Chicago criminal defense lawyers can protect you from prosecutors, the media, and investigators through your case.

We can handle white crime cases that include:

  • Embezzlement
  • Fraud
  • Forgery
  • Money laundering
  • Insider trading
  • Tax evasion
  • Identity theft

Schedule a case evaluation with an experienced attorney: (312) 883-9466.

Consequences of a White Collar Crime Conviction

If convicted, you could face very severe penalties, including jail time, fines, restitution, and a criminal record. Even after you have paid off your debt society, a felony conviction on your record is a red flag for employers, who are reluctant to hire felons. This is why it is so important that you find a legal advocate who will fight for you in court. Our Chicago white collar crime defense lawyers are known as fierce litigators with an impressive track record of courtroom successes.

Se habla español and Mówimy po polsku.

Facing Serious Charges? We Can Fight for You.

White collar crime charges require serious defense. Make sure that you have a team who is ready to battle for you at the highest levels of the criminal justice system. Turn to our team at Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC for smart, savvy, and zealous defense. Your future matters, and we are here to help you protect it.

Call our office at (312) 883-9466 to schedule a case review.


    People v. IP (2014) Mr. IP was arrested for possession of a large amount of a controlled substance after Chicago police executed a search warrant. Arguing that the information in the search warrant was fabricated, Mr. Pissetzky filed a Motion to Produce Informant. Against the odds, the judge granted the motion and ordered the State to produce the informant. When the State failed to do so, the judge dismissed the case.
  • Sentenced Reduced Heroin Conspiracy
    USA v. DA – 2011 – Mr. DA was charged in one the biggest Heroin busts in Chicago. DA was facing a mandatory life sentence under the Federal Rules because he was a repeat offender. After long negotiations, Mr. Pissetzky was able to demonstrate that DA was not part of the conspiracy and convinced the judge to sentence DA to only 37 months. All other charges were dropped.
  • Case Dismissed Motion Granted, Case Dismissed
    People v. RMC – Chicago police officers received information that a 2 kilo cocaine deal was going to happen in a garage. They set up surveillance and saw RMC pull into the garage in car. When he walked out of the garage, the Chicago police officers arrested him. While the officers searched the garage and car, they found 2 kilos of cocaine in the car. Mr. Pissetzky and another attorney filed a Motion to Suppress the Arrest and Quash the evidence. After a highly contested hearing, the judge held that the Chicago Police officers violated RMC’s Constitutional rights under the 4th Amendment, and Granted the Motion. The prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss all charges against RMC.
  • Not Guilty Not Guilty: possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver
    People v. JB – 2011 – Mr. JB was charged with 3 other co-defendants with possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver. Although the State’s attorney made a very low offer for a plea, Mr. Pissetzky advised JB to proceed to trail. During a bench trial, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that JB did not have any knowledge of the drugs that were recovered from the car of the co-defendant. Although the police testified that they saw the drug transaction, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the judge that the state did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge found JB NOT GUILTY on all charges.
  • Not Guilty on All Counts People v. AB
    AB was charged with child pornography, criminal sexual abuse and criminal sexual assault. Although the State made several offers on the case, Mr.Pissetzky and another attorney demanded trial. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross-examined the State’s witnesses and proved that AB did not know that the victim was under 18 years of age. After listening to the evidence, the judge found AB NOT GUILTY on all counts.
  • Dismissed People v. AH
    AH was charged with possessions with intent to distribute a large amount of cocaine. Mr. Pissetzky litigation skills led to the dismissal of all charges against AH.
  • Case Dismissed People v. ARP
    ARP was charged with a Class X felony of Possession with Intent to Distribute cocaine . After careful review of the police reports, Mr. Pissetzky filed a motion to quash and suppress evidence. At the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that that the Cook County Sheriff that stopped ARP search ARP’s car illegally. The judge Granted the motion to quash and suppress and the case against ARP was Dismissed.
  • Not Guilty People v. FR
    FR was charged with predatory criminal assault, and 4 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault. During a week long jury trial, Mr. Pissetzky exposed the alleged minor “victim” as a liar. In addition, Mr. Pissetzky call witnesses to testify to the true nature of the “victim”. After grueling cross-examinations, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all charges.
  • Not Guilty People v. H
    People v. H- H was charged with the first degree murder of 3 people. The prosecutor had two witnesses that claimed they were with H when he committed the murders. After receiving the discovery from the prosecutor, Mr. Pissetzky and his team conducted their own investigation and uncovered that someone else committed the murders. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross examined the prosecutions witnesses and exposed their lies. After the prosecution rested their case, Mr. Pissetzky moved the court to dismiss all charges and find H not guilty. The Judge agreed with Mr. Pissetzky and found H Not Guilty of all charges dismissing the case.
  • Not Guilty People v. RT
    RT was charged with Possession with intent to deliver half a kilogram of Heroin. RT was facing a Class X Felony. Chicago police officers executed a search warrant at his home where they seized the Heroin. Mr. Pissetzky demonstrated to the judge during cross examination that RT did not have the required knowledge that the Heroin was at the home. The judge found RT Not Guilty.


  • “Highly Recommended”


  • “Phenomenal Attorney”


  • “Got me the best possible outcome I could have hoped for.”
  • “Got me the best possible outcome, highly recommend”

    Former Client

  • “Gal saved me from prison”


  • “He saved me from jail!”

    Former Client

  • “I knew I was done until I hired Gal”

    Former Client

  • “We are SUPER BLESSED to have found a great attorney like Mr. Pissetzky. He helped me in a legal situation that would have been a nightmare for my ...”


  • “Fantastic attorney”

    Former Client

  • “I will recommend him to anyone who really needs the best attorney!”

    Former Client

  • “Gal saved my life!!!”


  • “I highly recommend Gal Pissetzky!!!”


  • “Magnificent, impressive, very great work”

    Mr. & Mrs. LaGrone Sr.

  • “Highly Recommended”


  • “Super professional and knowlegeable lawyer!”