SE HABLA ESPAÑOL. MÓWIMY PO POLSKU.
To Get Us In Your Corner Call Now 312.883.9466
EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS DEFENDING CLIENTS NATIONWIDE

Chicago Public Corruption Attorney

Call Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC Today

Public officials, government workers, politicians, and business leaders alike may all find themselves at the center of public corruption investigations, a serious federal offense. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is not known for its leniency in pursuing these cases and prosecutors may stop at nothing to secure a conviction. When an alleged offense calls your character into question, our firm can help you fight back and protect your name. At Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC, we possess more than 20 years of legal experience and have a proven track record of defending clients against severe federal charges. Secure the services of our Chicago federal defense lawyers and rest assured knowing that your case is in experienced hands.


Accused of public corruption? Call (312) 883-9466 to learn more about your case.


Defending Federal Corruption Charges

Public corruption charges can often stem from white-collar crimes such as fraud, bribery, and extortion; a conviction can be punishable by years in prison and substantial fines. Allegations alone of public corruption can subject you to a vigorous federal criminal investigation. The moment that you become aware that you may be part of an ongoing investigation, it is time to get our firm involved. We are backed by numerous legal accolades and can fight zealously to defend your reputation.

Public corruption can be applied to a wide range of illicit actions. Our firm can help defend you from charges including:

  • Soliciting bribes or kickbacks
  • Bribery of public officials
  • Criminal conflict of interests
  • Misuse of government funds
  • Federal contract bid rigging

Facing Charges? We Can Fight for You

If you have been charged with public corruption or a related offense, waste no time in contacting Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC. The complexity and circumstantial nature of cases involving alleged bribery, fraud, or corruption demand the attention of skilled attorneys, like those from our firm.

Our Chicago federal crime attorneys can help you to navigate through every step of your case, advising you of your rights and legal options. If you are a federal employee, we can help you to understand the specific factors which may come into play.

Contact us today to schedule a review of your case with our legal team.

OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE VICTORIES

  • Dropped All Charges after Motion USA v. Client O

    USA v. Client O - After a complex investigation into child pornography on the internet, federal agents obtained a search warrant to search O’s home and work computers. A forensic review of the devises seized revealed child pornography and O was charged with Possession and distribution of child pornography and altering a hard drive to obstructed the investigation. Mr. Pissetzky and his team used their own forensic expert to examine the computers and discovered that the Agent lied in his affidavit for the search warrants. After filing a motion to suppress the warrant, the government conceded and dropped all child pornography charges. O pled guilty to obstructing the investigation and received a sentence well below the guidelines.

  • Not Guilty Wrongfully Accused of Murder and Attempted Murder: Not Guilty
    MH had been wrongfully accused of murder and attempted murder. Mr. Pissetzky tried to explain to the State’s Attorneys that they had the wrong man, but it fell on deaf ears. Mr. Pissetzky then demanded trial , and after a week of relentless cross-examination, the jury returned a verdict of NOT GUILTY on all charges – NOT GUILTY of murder and NOT GUILTY of attempt murder – in less then two hours!!
  • Sentence Reduced Pissetzky Saves Defendant from Crack-Cocaine Drug Conspiracy and Other Drug Charges
    (USA v. SO (2010)) – In 2008, the DEA arrested SO for taking part in a large crack cocaine drug conspiracy. At the preliminary hearing, Mr. Pissetzky was able to demonstrate that SO was not involved in the overall conspiracy, and eventually SO was indicted on only two drug transactions he allegedly conducted. During plea negotiations, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the government to dismiss the actual drug charges, and SO pled guilty to a much lesser charge. SO was originally facing over 10 years in prison. At the sentencing hearing before Judge Zagel, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the Judge to sentence SO to time served (roughly 24 months).
  • Not Guilty Marijuana Trafficking Not Guilty
    People v. BR – NOT GUILTY verdict by a jury. BR was charged with Marijuana Trafficking over 1100LB. Mr. Pissetzky and another attorney tried the case to a jury. After a three day trial, the jury deliberated for less then two hours finding BR Not Guilty.
  • Not Guilty People v. GE
    Finding of Not Guilty! GE was charged with possession with intent to deliver a kilogram of heroine, a class X felony carrying a minimum of 15 years in prison. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky proved that the prosecutor did not have sufficient evidence to show that GE ever possessed the drugs.
  • Dismissed USA v. DD
    DD was charged with selling narcotics and was charged in Federal court in Chicago. Mr. Pissetzky was able to present to the prosecutor enough evidence to convince the prosecutor to dismiss all charges against DD.
  • Dismissed People v. AH
    AH was charged with possessions with intent to distribute a large amount of cocaine. Mr. Pissetzky litigation skills led to the dismissal of all charges against AH.
  • Case Dismissed Motion Granted, Case Dismissed
    People v. RMC – Chicago police officers received information that a 2 kilo cocaine deal was going to happen in a garage. They set up surveillance and saw RMC pull into the garage in car. When he walked out of the garage, the Chicago police officers arrested him. While the officers searched the garage and car, they found 2 kilos of cocaine in the car. Mr. Pissetzky and another attorney filed a Motion to Suppress the Arrest and Quash the evidence. After a highly contested hearing, the judge held that the Chicago Police officers violated RMC’s Constitutional rights under the 4th Amendment, and Granted the Motion. The prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss all charges against RMC.
  • Case Dimissed Motion to Suppress Heroin Granted
    People v. AP – After Chicago Police officers walked up to AP after he parked his car, they searched him and the car and found about 1/2 a kilo of Heroin. AP was arrested and charged with a Class X felony. Mr. Pissetzky and Mr. De Leon filed a Motion to Suppress Heroin and Quash AP’s arrest. During the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that the officers lied and that they violated AP’s Fourth Amendment Rights. The judge granted the motion and the State’s Attorney had no choice but to dismiss the case.
  • Case Dismissed Motion Granted Case Dismissed
    People v. RW – RW was charged with a Class X Felony of Possession with Intent to Deliver Marijuana. Chicago Police Officers stopped RW after they saw him place 2 large UPS boxes in the trunk of his car. The officers believed that the boxes contained marijuana. After the stop, the officers searched the car and recovered the boxes. The boxes in fact contained a large amount of marijuana. Mr. Gal Pissetzky, along with co-counsel, filed a Motion to Quash Arrest and Suppress Evidence claiming that RW was illegally stopped and searched. During the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky cross examined the Chicago Police officers and proved to the judge that the officers acted illegally and violated RW’s Constitutional Rights under the Fourth Amendment. The judge granted the Motion and all charges against RW were dismissed.

TRUSTED AND HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

SEE WHAT OUR CLIENTS ARE SAYING
  • “We are SUPER BLESSED to have found a great attorney like Mr. Pissetzky. He helped me in a legal situation that would have been a nightmare for my ...”

    Andy

  • “I knew I was done until I hired Gal”

    Former Client

  • “I HIGHLY RECOMMEND GAL PISSETZKY”
  • “Highly Recommended”

    Chrissy

  • “I can't have chosen a better criminal lawyer.”

    Anonymous

  • “Magnificent, impressive, very great work”

    Mr. & Mrs. LaGrone Sr.

  • “Highly Recommended”

    Jesse

  • “Very highly recommended!”

    Scott E.

  • “Phenomenal Attorney”

    George

  • “I highly recommend Gal Pissetzky!!!”

    Sonni

  • “Fantastic attorney”

    Former Client

  • “I will recommend him to anyone who really needs the best attorney!”

    Former Client

  • “Got me the best possible outcome I could have hoped for.”
  • “Best Attorney Ever”

    Joe

  • “Super Federal Criminal Lawyer”

    Fernando