To Get Us In Your Corner Call Now 312.883.9466

Chicago Public Corruption Attorney

Call Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC Today

Public officials, government workers, politicians, and business leaders alike may all find themselves at the center of public corruption investigations, a serious federal offense. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is not known for its leniency in pursuing these cases and prosecutors may stop at nothing to secure a conviction. When an alleged offense calls your character into question, our firm can help you fight back and protect your name. At Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC, we possess more than 15 years of legal experience and have a proven track record of defending clients against severe federal charges. Secure the services of our Chicago federal defense lawyers and rest assured knowing that your case is in experienced hands.

Accused of public corruption? Call (312) 883-9466 to learn more about your case.

Defending Federal Corruption Charges

Public corruption charges can often stem from white-collar crimes such as fraud, bribery, and extortion; a conviction can be punishable by years in prison and substantial fines. Allegations alone of public corruption can subject you to a vigorous federal criminal investigation. The moment that you become aware that you may be part of an ongoing investigation, it is time to get our firm involved. We are backed by numerous legal accolades and can fight zealously to defend your reputation.

Public corruption can be applied to a wide range of illicit actions. Our firm can help defend you from charges including:

  • Soliciting bribes or kickbacks
  • Bribery of public officials
  • Criminal conflict of interests
  • Misuse of government funds
  • Federal contract bid rigging

Facing Charges? We Can Fight for You

If you have been charged with public corruption or a related offense, waste no time in contacting Pissetzky & Berliner, LLC. The complexity and circumstantial nature of cases involving alleged bribery, fraud, or corruption demand the attention of skilled attorneys, like those from our firm.

Our Chicago federal crime attorneys can help you to navigate through every step of your case, advising you of your rights and legal options. If you are a federal employee, we can help you to understand the specific factors which may come into play.

Contact us today to schedule a review of your case with our legal team.


    People v. IP (2014) Mr. IP was arrested for possession of a large amount of a controlled substance after Chicago police executed a search warrant. Arguing that the information in the search warrant was fabricated, Mr. Pissetzky filed a Motion to Produce Informant. Against the odds, the judge granted the motion and ordered the State to produce the informant. When the State failed to do so, the judge dismissed the case.
  • Sentenced Reduced Heroin Conspiracy
    USA v. DA – 2011 – Mr. DA was charged in one the biggest Heroin busts in Chicago. DA was facing a mandatory life sentence under the Federal Rules because he was a repeat offender. After long negotiations, Mr. Pissetzky was able to demonstrate that DA was not part of the conspiracy and convinced the judge to sentence DA to only 37 months. All other charges were dropped.
  • Case Dismissed Motion Granted, Case Dismissed
    People v. RMC – Chicago police officers received information that a 2 kilo cocaine deal was going to happen in a garage. They set up surveillance and saw RMC pull into the garage in car. When he walked out of the garage, the Chicago police officers arrested him. While the officers searched the garage and car, they found 2 kilos of cocaine in the car. Mr. Pissetzky and another attorney filed a Motion to Suppress the Arrest and Quash the evidence. After a highly contested hearing, the judge held that the Chicago Police officers violated RMC’s Constitutional rights under the 4th Amendment, and Granted the Motion. The prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss all charges against RMC.
  • Not Guilty Not Guilty: possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver
    People v. JB – 2011 – Mr. JB was charged with 3 other co-defendants with possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver. Although the State’s attorney made a very low offer for a plea, Mr. Pissetzky advised JB to proceed to trail. During a bench trial, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that JB did not have any knowledge of the drugs that were recovered from the car of the co-defendant. Although the police testified that they saw the drug transaction, Mr. Pissetzky convinced the judge that the state did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge found JB NOT GUILTY on all charges.
  • Not Guilty on All Counts People v. AB
    AB was charged with child pornography, criminal sexual abuse and criminal sexual assault. Although the State made several offers on the case, Mr.Pissetzky and another attorney demanded trial. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross-examined the State’s witnesses and proved that AB did not know that the victim was under 18 years of age. After listening to the evidence, the judge found AB NOT GUILTY on all counts.
  • Dismissed People v. AH
    AH was charged with possessions with intent to distribute a large amount of cocaine. Mr. Pissetzky litigation skills led to the dismissal of all charges against AH.
  • Case Dismissed People v. AMM

    People v. AMM - Mr. AMM was charged with trafficking over 100lb of marijuana. Officers can to a home he was renting and after entering and searching the home, they seized over 100lb of marijuana. Mr. Pissetzky filed a motion to suppress evidence arguing that the officers entered the home without a warrant or consent. After a hearing in which Mr. Pissetzky impeached the testifying officer and exposed his lies, the Judge granted the motion and the case was dismissed.

  • Case Dismissed People v. ARP
    ARP was charged with a Class X felony of Possession with Intent to Distribute cocaine . After careful review of the police reports, Mr. Pissetzky filed a motion to quash and suppress evidence. At the hearing, Mr. Pissetzky proved to the judge that that the Cook County Sheriff that stopped ARP search ARP’s car illegally. The judge Granted the motion to quash and suppress and the case against ARP was Dismissed.
  • Not Guilty People v. FR
    FR was charged with predatory criminal assault, and 4 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault. During a week long jury trial, Mr. Pissetzky exposed the alleged minor “victim” as a liar. In addition, Mr. Pissetzky call witnesses to testify to the true nature of the “victim”. After grueling cross-examinations, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty on all charges.
  • Not Guilty People v. H
    People v. H- H was charged with the first degree murder of 3 people. The prosecutor had two witnesses that claimed they were with H when he committed the murders. After receiving the discovery from the prosecutor, Mr. Pissetzky and his team conducted their own investigation and uncovered that someone else committed the murders. At trial, Mr. Pissetzky cross examined the prosecutions witnesses and exposed their lies. After the prosecution rested their case, Mr. Pissetzky moved the court to dismiss all charges and find H not guilty. The Judge agreed with Mr. Pissetzky and found H Not Guilty of all charges dismissing the case.


  • “I knew I was done until I hired Gal”

    Former Client

  • “Best Attorney Ever”


  • “Highly Recommended”


  • “Gal Pissetzky”

    Alejandro Martínez-Medina

  • “Highly Recommended”


  • “Super Federal Criminal Lawyer”


  • “He saved me from jail!”

    Former Client

  • “I can't have chosen a better criminal lawyer.”


  • “Excellent Lawyer!”


  • “We are SUPER BLESSED to have found a great attorney like Mr. Pissetzky. He helped me in a legal situation that would have been a nightmare for my ...”


  • “I will recommend him to anyone who really needs the best attorney!”

    Former Client

  • “I highly recommend Gal Pissetzky!!!”


  • “Super professional and knowlegeable lawyer!”


  • “Very highly recommended!”

    Scott E.